PhDs at Work

A Professional Network for PhDs across Industries

  • About
    • About PhDs At Work
    • Impact
    • Contact
  • Week in the Life
    • About Week in the Life
    • One Year Later
    • Explore Guest Bloggers
      • Company
      • Work Sector
      • Degree Field
      • Author
  • Podcast
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Event Albums
  • Opportunities

Nanette Fornabai (Wed)

July 22, 2015 By Nanette Fornabai

I spent several months maybe even years thinking that “corporate America” was a foreign country. I was acutely aware of my differences and the strange customs and language this new world presented me. And in retrospect that may have helped me be successful. I had experience in learning foreign languages, so I did it, again here. I learned a new language full of terms like “deliverables,” “reach out,” and “vertical,” and expressions like “let’s not try to boil the ocean,” or “we need to take this to the next level.” As I had done in my Paris days, I wrote down the unfamiliar terms, looked to speakers who could help me understand and communicate as needed, and identified people I admired to mimic.

But in the end I learned to trust my gut. I knew what I liked to do and volunteered for opportunities that involved those things. I like to create things, to make them hang together as one, and “make them shine.” It’s beyond design and not really design at all. But I volunteered for projects that needed a new look or needed to be innovative and or present the content in a different way. And after awhile, I was handed them. For one of my first projects I worked with an artist to create a “graphic novella” that was published in installments as part of a company-wide awareness campaign. I saw the similarities between the serialized novels I wrote about in my dissertation and what I was producing – and thought how cool is this? It was well-received. We pulled metrics, did surveys, and it even got positive reviews from senior leaders. So I kept going and going for it. And I kept trying to improve upon what I learned. I researched, I talked to people. I didn’t write a scholarly article or for a trade journal, but I did nurture it. Yes, I cultivated my own garden. And I still do.

Today, like every single day, I spend at least two-to-three hours working with PowerPoint (PPT). This includes creating, thinking about, designing and writing content for it. PowerPoint is my weapon of choice. I don’t know how I found it, but I’m grateful I did. For me, it’s what the blank pages of my dissertation were always lacking. For me, it’s more than what people criticize it for. Yes, people cram too many words onto two-toned light blue pages with random white swirls on them and call it a PPT presentation. That’s PPT at its worst. When you see it at its best, it’s a glorious canvas upon which great artists (and I’m not one yet) can express all things good and bad, new and old, and the complexity of all those things.

I knew nothing of PowerPoint when I joined the ranks of “corporate America.” My first attempt to use it was a miserable failure. I knew it had some kind of image capabilities, but I thought it offered me what illustrations could do for books or what the Russian filmmakers like Kuleshov or Eisenstein did through juxtapositions. The first reaction in hindsight was entirely predictable. Apparently the words I put on the slides made sense and interpreted and distilled the policy correctly. But the images did nothing but distract. No big deal or drama there, the subject matter specialist simply stated: “Let’s just get rid of all of the images.” So I did. But I was hooked. I wanted to see how I could use both words and images to make meaning. And so I made it a part of my business to learn how to better use PowerPoint. Yes, I know that may seem horribly silly and small to anyone who at any point in time styled themselves as a great thinker, writer, artist or innovator. But, I’m over that. I like PowerPoint!

So today I’m working on two different kinds of PowerPoint projects. The first is a more traditional presentation, but it involves a more careful and time-consuming design and build. It’ll accompany a presenter who will use it to give a webcast to a group of people sitting in one room looking at a screen. I’ve thought of the design before and what I’m trying to express. It’s a grouping of icons that each stand for the different ways of communicating and the different ways communication has changed. I’ll use each of those icons later in the presentation, but this is the first comprehensive look and it’s setting up the rest. I couldn’t figure out how to connect them without having them look random and messy. But while I was listening to a town-hall call and someone else was presenting what they were doing, unrelated but also in PowerPoint, I saw something and hit on the right way to show the interconnectedness visually. So now I just need to do the work and make sure it functions.

The second is an interactive PDF. This is a new frontier for me. It’s basically an online book with auto-advance, glossary term look up, embedded videos, etc. And it offers a richer more three-dimensional way of presenting content. The entire rectangular page is open to me. The learner can enter it at any point, flip through it from beginning to end or skip around to focus on different sections. It’s not very technical, but it’s a skill I want to learn and master. And it’s got legs right now as a learning asset of choice, so I’m designing, thinking about, and testing out different solutions to organize all 60 pages of this content into the new format.

 


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of PwC.

 

Nanette Fornabai (Tues)
Nanette Fornabai (Thurs)

Pay it forward. Share and help someone else find this resource!

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • Reddit
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Print
  • Email

Related

Comments

  1. Patricia Bouteneff says

    July 22, 2015 at 10:27 AM

    Nanette, this is fascinating. I’ve been following your week with great interest. I understand what you mean about learning corporate-speak as a new language and the joys PowerPoint–I’ve almost abandoned Word for it–though I’ve never taken to the level that you have. I’d love to hear more about that some time.

    Reply
    • Nanette Fornabai says

      August 10, 2015 at 7:36 AM

      Hi Patricia! Thanks for your feedback. Yes, PPT is my new chosen idiom. And l’d be happy to chat more about it.

      Reply

Questions? Share your thoughts! Cancel reply

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Nanette Fornabai, PhD

Training Manager,
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)

PhD, French Studies

(I)nhumanizing norms: “Fantoms,” Detectives and Machines in Late Nineteenth Century French Popular Culture

Brown University, 2003

Connect with Nanette

My professional philosophy in a nutshell:

Just jump. Don’t get stuck. Don’t over think or try to see the future. Raise your hand, throw your hat in the ring, stand up and I say I’ll give it a shot. And then jump.

If I had to do it all over again, I would …

... have understood sooner what I like and don’t like to do, been OK with that, and have tried to do it earlier.

Nanette's "Week in the Life"

  • Nanette Fornabai (Fri)
  • Nanette Fornabai (Thurs)
  • Nanette Fornabai (Wed)
  • Nanette Fornabai (Tues)
  • Nanette Fornabai (Mon)
  • Nanette Fornabai | PwC

Which is more important: luck, smarts, or know-how?

They’re all important, but at different times perhaps. And with the exception of “luck.” Instead of luck, I would call it keeping the lines of communication open with people in your network. In making the jump, what helped me a lot, and still does, was talking to people I went to school with who were not in academia (and happy and successful). Then too it was demonstrating that I’m smart enough to figure out this new job, new career, new whatever it is. Later, while brains and conversations are still very important, you have to be able prove that you have the know-how and be able to bring it forward with you when a new opportunity comes along.

Best career advice I ever received:

Compartmentalize your work life and your private life. As a graduate student, I excelled at working anywhere, anytime – at the library, a friend’s house, at the bar, at home, over the weekends, during holidays, late at night, etc. While this may have prepared me to work outside of the traditional office space now, and while there still may be occasions when I have to work at night or over the weekends, it is not something sustainable in “corporate America.” In fact, it’s a guaranteed way to burn out and burn out fast.

If I knew then what I know now, I would …

... have potentially made the jump to another profession sooner. I say potentially because I value all of my experiences and wouldn’t really want to change anything I did. Plus I can’t, so there.

More Corporate Bloggers

  • Benjamin Levitt | Birkhäuser (Springer)
  • Nanette Fornabai | PwC
  • Peter A. Bacevice | HLW International
  • David Hardtke | LinkedIn
  • Aviad Eilam | Rosetta Stone
  • David Craig | CannonDesign
  • Maria Irchenhauser | DWPub
  • Alison Fisher | CloudBase Services
  • Kevin Eckerle | Accenture
  • Adam Capitanio | Berghahn Books
  • Chris Humphrey | Triodos Bank
  • Patricia Fann Bouteneff | Citi
  • Tse-Sung Wu | Genentech

Looking for something specific?

Copyright © 2011-2021 PhDs at Work, All Rights Reserved

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.