PhDs at Work

A Professional Network for PhDs across Industries

  • About
    • About PhDs At Work
    • Impact
    • Contact
  • Week in the Life
    • About Week in the Life
    • One Year Later
    • Explore Guest Bloggers
      • Company
      • Work Sector
      • Degree Field
      • Author
  • Podcast
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Event Albums
  • Opportunities

David Hardtke (Fri)

October 17, 2014 By David Hardtke

Not surprisingly, today I spent some more time recruiting. It is unfortunate that I am doing this “Week in the Life” series in a somewhat abnormal week. My total time spent in recruiting related activities was about 12 hours, whereas normally it is 2 to 3 hours. Of course, meeting smart and interesting people is fun.

The recruiting activity du jour was a panel of LinkedIn scientists and engineers speaking to some attendees of the nearby RecSys conference. I served on the panel with a few of the top engineers at LinkedIn who are working on recommender systems, search, and standardization. We talked about how we got to LinkedIn, about what we were working on, and took questions from the audience. It is interesting to see how different people view their work – some people emphasize the cutting edge technology at LinkedIn and some people emphasize the collective brainpower. I emphasized that we are in a unique position to transform the way workers and companies find each other. I am old enough to have looked for my first jobs using the want ads in the local newspaper. I submitted paper resumes, and sometimes even paid for that extra fancy heavy paper. The internet democratized the application process by reducing the barriers to apply – recycled electrons are free. Online job postings and applications did create problems, however. There is no way that anyone can find all the relevant openings unless looking for openings is their full time job. I don’t think I should have to find a job – the job should find me. Similarly, my relationship with my employer has changed – I won’t work here for the rest of my career (and they probably would not want me to). Everyone needs to be always looking for their next play at some level (Reid Hoffman, the LinkedIn founder, wrote about this in his book The Startup of You).

I did have a very interesting lunch. I met with Sydney Liu, the founder of a company called Talent Trail. Sydney is a student at USC, and founded this company with a small seed grant from USC. They are trying to build a marketplace for internships. I probably shouldn’t be talking to him since they are potential competitors, but I can’t help but admire his perseverance in bootstrapping this startup. I asked him how he paid for the trip to the Bay Area from Los Angeles, and he told me that the trip only cost $20 (cost of Megabus ticket). I think he met with me for the free lunch. He attended an expensive HR conference last week on a similar budget.

I need to cut my post short today – everyone at LinkedIn flees the office early when there is a conference at Shoreline Amphitheater (it can take two hours to get out of the parking lot once the concert traffic starts). I am not going to the Snoop Dog show, so I want to get out of here. Writing these posts was a great exercise for me – it helped me take a real mental inventory of how I spend my time. For each activity, I can assign points. Does it make my team better (+10 pts)? Does it make me better (+5 pts)? Does it make LinkedIn better (+3pts)? Is it a complete waste of time but keeps me sane (+ 1 pt)? I’ll add up my score for the week tomorrow while I am running the Golden Hills marathon in Berkeley (for which I am completely unprepared, but that is a common trend for me.

David Hardtke (Thurs)
Tony Kireopoulos | One Year Later

Pay it forward. Share and help someone else find this resource!

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • Reddit
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Print
  • Email

Related

Questions? Share your thoughts! Cancel reply

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

David Hardtke, PhD

Sr. Engineering Manager LinkedIn

PhD, Physics

Pion Interferometry in 158 GeV/nucleon Pb+Pb Collisions

The Ohio State University, 1997

Connect with David

Which is more important: luck, smarts, or know-how?

Most important is having the smarts and know-how to recognize and seize a lucky break.

If I had to do it all over again, I would…

... have taken a programming class in college.

David's "Week in the Life"

  • PhDs 005: Job Search – with David Hardtke
  • David Hardtke (Fri)
  • David Hardtke (Thurs)
  • David Hardtke (Wed)
  • David Hardtke (Tues)
  • David Hardtke (Mon)
  • David Hardtke | LinkedIn

If I knew then what I know now, I would…

... have recognized that the guys down the hall at CERN working on the nascent World Wide Web were up to something important.

More Corporate Bloggers

  • Benjamin Levitt | Birkhäuser (Springer)
  • Nanette Fornabai | PwC
  • Peter A. Bacevice | HLW International
  • David Hardtke | LinkedIn
  • Aviad Eilam | Rosetta Stone
  • David Craig | CannonDesign
  • Maria Irchenhauser | DWPub
  • Alison Fisher | CloudBase Services
  • Kevin Eckerle | Accenture
  • Adam Capitanio | Berghahn Books
  • Chris Humphrey | Triodos Bank
  • Patricia Fann Bouteneff | Citi
  • Tse-Sung Wu | Genentech

Looking for something specific?

Copyright © 2011-2021 PhDs at Work, All Rights Reserved

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.