PhDs at Work

A Professional Network for PhDs across Industries

  • About
    • About PhDs At Work
    • Impact
    • Contact
  • Week in the Life
    • About Week in the Life
    • One Year Later
    • Explore Guest Bloggers
      • Company
      • Work Sector
      • Degree Field
      • Author
  • Podcast
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Event Albums
  • Opportunities

Benjamin Levitt | Birkhäuser (Springer)

August 16, 2015 By Benjamin Levitt

Benjamin Levitt

I will confess that when I switched from studying poetry to studying mathematics, I didn’t notice much of a difference. This will tell you something about my sensibilities (though I’m not sure what exactly).

When I announced over dinner to friends that I was leaving my graduate program in Comparative Literature, none of them seem surprised. This is not a particularly rare thing for a grad student to say and I was not a particularly enthusiastic grad student. Mostly, people nodded and continued to eat. Someone asked me what I was going to do instead, and I answered “The opposite of comp. lit,” and after a moment’s consideration of what that would be, came up with “I’m going to be an electrical engineer”. We finished eating. (This is still pretty much how I do my “career planning”.)

I wasn’t entirely sure what classes I would need to become an engineer, but I figured I’d have to finish the calculus sequence, so that’s where I started. I got myself an extremely cheap apartment, a job as a cook, and a seat in a calculus class. One semester into my new plan, I enrolled in a class called something like “Introduction to Abstract Algebra”. (This course had nothing to do with electrical engineering, but it fit into my schedule, didn’t have many prerequisites, and had a baffling course description. It seemed like the thing to take. Probably there were some practical considerations, possibly that actual engineering classes were not offered over the summer, but maybe not even that.) I found this class to be exactly what I thought studying poetry would be like. And if that is a surprising sentence to read, imagine how surprised I was at the time.

A couple of classes later, I started my PhD program in math. This went much better than my first grad program, I defended a few years later and went on to a tenure track position in Northern California. I was in a quaint college town, a few hours up from San Francisco, with a job that I had been working toward for the better part of a decade. The students were nice, my department was happy with me, and it seemed very much like something I did not like. Despite my hopes, even tenure didn’t make the job more satisfying – it just made it more secure, which is not the quality I was looking for in a job whose challenges I didn’t find enticing. So, I started looking for other opportunities, despite having no real idea where to look or for what I was looking. I am very proud of what I did as a professor and grateful that I had the opportunity to do it. But I am also certain that it was not the right place for me, and I am just as proud to have left behind comfort and stability for new challenges and uncertainty. I would say that it wasn’t the most practical decision, but I don’t believe that; happiness is extremely practical and it’s worth going out of my way to find.

A serendipitous bit of timing gave me my next opportunity. I was offered the position of Chief of Education at the National Museum of Mathematics, still a few months from opening its doors in New York. So, I left California and headed back east. Being part of the team of people who opened the Museum was one of the most exciting times of my life. The work was difficult, unending, and exhilarating. I was there to design the educational programs for North America’s only math museum and had a great time doing it. Much of my job was coming up with programs at every level (and we hosted pre-k through graduate students) that gave everyone a taste of the kind of fun that mathematicians get to have. And after working nearly non-stop for my first couple of months, I stood inside a brand new museum, next to my colleagues and friends, and waited until the appointed hour to open the doors and let the public see what we’d made.

The first year of operation of the Museum was a bit of madness (in a good way mostly). It was just what I left academia to find – always-new problems waiting for creative solutions. This was also my first truly collaborative project, with so many people bringing so many different skills. This was a feature that I was actively looking for when I broke away from what I felt was the isolation of academia. Working as part of such a dedicated team was inspiring and terrific fun. Once the Museum settled into its second year, my post settled into a more straightforward administrative position, and I moved on to find something more exciting with more opportunities to learn new things.

Which brings me to where I currently am, the mathematics editor for Birkhäuser, North America. We mostly publish research monographs and graduate (and some advanced undergraduate) textbooks, though I don’t “edit” any of them in the way you might be thinking. Mine is an acquisitions position, which I think of as detective work: I am looking for the best math books that only exist in the future and then work backwards to find the people to write them. My job has me traveling the world, meeting with top researchers in all areas of math, along with some areas of engineering, computer science, physics, and philosophy. I look for the most exciting research and try to find the most suitable people to put it to paper. Not bad.

I’m not sure what kind of person would have planned such a path, but I don’t think we’d have much in common (except for our resumes, I guess).

I’m looking forward to sharing my week. Thanks for reading!

David Craig | One Year Later
Benjamin Levitt (Mon)

Pay it forward. Share and help someone else find this resource!

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • Reddit
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Print
  • Email

Related

Comments

  1. K Lagos says

    August 24, 2018 at 3:20 PM

    Hey, this is to say I really enjoyed reading your story. I wonder, does this impractical pursuit of happiness come natural to you or did you need to take courage before your every major change?

    Reply

Questions? Share your thoughts! Cancel reply

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Benjamin Levitt, PhD

Editor, Mathematics
Birkhäuser (Springer)


PhD, Mathematics and Statistics

Tate-Shafarevich Groups of Jacobians of Fermat Curves

Univeristy of Arizona, 2006

Connect with Benjamin

My professional philosophy in a nutshell:

Be open, be generous, be creative, and be calm.

Which is more important: luck, smarts, or know-how?

My mathematical instinct is to start with giving definitions of the three qualities and state the metric I'm using to measure importance. My cynical answer would be luck, but as someone giving advice I'd say know-how. Of course, for a blog, perhaps I should say all three: You need to be smart enough to apply your know-how when fortune provides the opportunity, etcetera.

Instead of any of that, I'll say that know-how is for sure the most important. Smarts won't hurt, but in the context of a profession, what is helpful is knowing how to get things done. Luck is good too, if you happen into some, but it's too elusive to spend any time or energy worrying about. (I once saw someone call two roulette tables in the span of ten minutes. He was not the least bit phased -- said he just got a feeling sometimes. I think that's the best attitude to have about luck of any flavor.)

Benjamin's "Week in the Life"

  • Benjamin Levitt (Fri)
  • Benjamin Levitt (Thurs)
  • Benjamin Levitt (Wed)
  • Benjamin Levitt (Tues)
  • Benjamin Levitt (Mon)
  • Benjamin Levitt | Birkhäuser (Springer)

The best career advice I ever received:

Plastics.

If I had to do it all over again, I would …

... All over? All of it? I'm not sure I'd change much. There was one time when I was supposed to go to a place where Bjork showed up just to hang out. I would go. Otherwise, I don't spend too much time on regret.

Mostly, it would be the same. Mistakes, frustrations, a terrible Italian car, wasted time, lost money, disappointments and all.
I would try to take more risks and worry less. I'm not sure I'd succeed in doing either; the attempt would be noble, though.

More Corporate Bloggers

  • Benjamin Levitt | Birkhäuser (Springer)
  • Nanette Fornabai | PwC
  • Peter A. Bacevice | HLW International
  • David Hardtke | LinkedIn
  • Aviad Eilam | Rosetta Stone
  • David Craig | CannonDesign
  • Maria Irchenhauser | DWPub
  • Alison Fisher | CloudBase Services
  • Kevin Eckerle | Accenture
  • Adam Capitanio | Berghahn Books
  • Chris Humphrey | Triodos Bank
  • Patricia Fann Bouteneff | Citi
  • Tse-Sung Wu | Genentech

Looking for something specific?

Copyright © 2011-2021 PhDs at Work, All Rights Reserved

 

Loading Comments...
 

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.